Memo: Pentagon Concerned About Legality of Interrogation Techniques
Document Shows Top Pentagon Officials Warned About Guantanamo Bay Interrogation Tactics
//
June 15, 2005 — The interrogation techniques used at Guantanamo Bay Detention Center in 2002 triggered concerns among senior Pentagon officials that they could face criminal prosecution under U.S. anti-torture laws, ABC News has learned.
Notes from a series of meetings at the Pentagon in early 2003 — obtained by ABC News — show that Alberto Mora, General Counsel of the Navy, warned his superiors that they might be breaking the law.
During a January 2003 meeting involving top Pentagon lawyer William Haynes and other officials, the memo shows that Mora warned that "use of coercive techniques … has military, legal, and political implication … has international implication … and exposes us to liability and criminal prosecution."
Mora's deep concerns about interrogations at Guantanamo have been known, but not his warning that top officials could go to prison.
In another meeting held March 8, 2003, the group of top Pentagon lawyers concluded — according to the memo — "we need a presidential letter approving the use of the controversial interrogation to cover those who may be called upon to use them."
No such letter was issued.
White House: Tactics Are Legal
Today, the White House insisted that tactics used at Guantanamo Bay are now — and have been — legal.
"All interrogation techniques that have been approved are lawful and consistent with our obligations," said White House press secretary Scott McClellan.
In another internal memo obtained by ABC News, a Navy psychologist observing the interrogation warned that the tactics used against Mohammed al Qahtani — dubbed "the 20th hijacker" — revealed "a tendency to become increasingly more aggressive without having a definite boundary."
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld said on Tuesday that interrogating al Qahtani had produced results.
Continued1. 2. NEXT»
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=852458&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
Document Shows Top Pentagon Officials Warned About Guantanamo Bay Interrogation Tactics
//
June 15, 2005 — The interrogation techniques used at Guantanamo Bay Detention Center in 2002 triggered concerns among senior Pentagon officials that they could face criminal prosecution under U.S. anti-torture laws, ABC News has learned.
Notes from a series of meetings at the Pentagon in early 2003 — obtained by ABC News — show that Alberto Mora, General Counsel of the Navy, warned his superiors that they might be breaking the law.
During a January 2003 meeting involving top Pentagon lawyer William Haynes and other officials, the memo shows that Mora warned that "use of coercive techniques … has military, legal, and political implication … has international implication … and exposes us to liability and criminal prosecution."
Mora's deep concerns about interrogations at Guantanamo have been known, but not his warning that top officials could go to prison.
In another meeting held March 8, 2003, the group of top Pentagon lawyers concluded — according to the memo — "we need a presidential letter approving the use of the controversial interrogation to cover those who may be called upon to use them."
No such letter was issued.
White House: Tactics Are Legal
Today, the White House insisted that tactics used at Guantanamo Bay are now — and have been — legal.
"All interrogation techniques that have been approved are lawful and consistent with our obligations," said White House press secretary Scott McClellan.
In another internal memo obtained by ABC News, a Navy psychologist observing the interrogation warned that the tactics used against Mohammed al Qahtani — dubbed "the 20th hijacker" — revealed "a tendency to become increasingly more aggressive without having a definite boundary."
Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld said on Tuesday that interrogating al Qahtani had produced results.
Continued1. 2. NEXT»
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=852458&page=1&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312
posted by Kangaroo Brisbane Australia at 6:12 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home