Skakel Case Deposition Raises Eyebrows (real killer found?)
Edited on Thu Jun-29-06 01:08 PM by NorthernSun
"Did you kill Martha Moxley on Oct. 30, 1975?"
That question was posed to Adolph "Al" Hasbrouck of Bridgeport during a sworn deposition last week in Stamford. He responded by invoking his constitutional right against self-incrimination.
In a development that Hope Seeley, a lawyer for convicted killer Michael Skakel, described as "huge," the man who has been cast by Skakel's lawyers as the more likely killer of Moxley refused to answer any of the hourlong string of questions put to him. He also did not bring to the deposition documents called for in the subpoena issued by Seeley and co-counsel Hubert Santos, including phone records dating from January 2002 - just before jury selection began in Skakel's trial - to the present.
"Did you kill Martha Moxley on Oct. 30, 1975?"
That question was posed to Adolph "Al" Hasbrouck of Bridgeport during a sworn deposition last week in Stamford. He responded by invoking his constitutional right against self-incrimination.
In a development that Hope Seeley, a lawyer for convicted killer Michael Skakel, described as "huge," the man who has been cast by Skakel's lawyers as the more likely killer of Moxley refused to answer any of the hourlong string of questions put to him. He also did not bring to the deposition documents called for in the subpoena issued by Seeley and co-counsel Hubert Santos, including phone records dating from January 2002 - just before jury selection began in Skakel's trial - to the present.
posted by Kangaroo Brisbane Australia at 5:53 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home