Why NYT's Friedman Should Resign
New York Times foreign policy analyst Thomas L. Friedman has finally admitted that his enthusiasm for invading Iraq was misguided, but his limited mea culpa hasn't stopped him from insulting Americans who opposed the war before the killing began. Now the questions are: Why should Americans listen to an "expert" who got the biggest post-Cold War foreign policy story wrong? And why doesn't Friedman have the decency to resign? August 21, 2006
Link Here
Is Bush a Clear & Present Danger?
As George W. Bush digs in his heels on keeping U.S. troops in Iraq indefinitely and points toward future conflicts with other Middle Eastern nations, the question arises whether his bombastic foreign policy -- and his refusal to admit mistakes -- make him "a clear and present danger" to U.S. national security. There's also the troubling fact that Bush's unpopularity around the world has made him a perfect foil for Islamic extremists. August 23, 2006
Link Here
Link Here
Is Bush a Clear & Present Danger?
As George W. Bush digs in his heels on keeping U.S. troops in Iraq indefinitely and points toward future conflicts with other Middle Eastern nations, the question arises whether his bombastic foreign policy -- and his refusal to admit mistakes -- make him "a clear and present danger" to U.S. national security. There's also the troubling fact that Bush's unpopularity around the world has made him a perfect foil for Islamic extremists. August 23, 2006
Link Here
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home