A General's False Testimony on KBR
Will the Pentagon correct Major Gen. Jerome Johnson's tainted testimony on the potentially contaminated water KBR provided to the troops?
When Major Gen. Jerome Johnson appeared under oath before a congressional committee last year, he told enough untruths about KBR's work for the military that the US Army took the unusual step of retracting a portion of his testimony. Now it appears that Johnson also misled members of the Senate Armed Services Committee on another KBR-related matter: its provisioning of potentially contaminated water to US troops in Iraq.
Nearly three months ago Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), chair of the Democratic Policy Committee, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates on the subject of Johnson's testimony, but he has yet to received a reply. "This was either an attempt by General Johnson to deliberately deceive the Congress, or a display of negligent disregard for facts," Dorgan wrote in the March 12 letter. "I hope you will review this matter and take appropriate action."
In April 2007, Johnson, then the commanding general of the US Army Sustainment Command, which is responsible for providing food, lodging, and a range of logistical support to the troops, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee to answer questions about the Pentagon's primary logistics contract in Iraq. During the hearing, the committee's chairman, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), alleged that the Army had reimbursed KBR, then a Halliburton subsidiary, for the cost of overpriced trailers the company had purchased through a subcontractor.
"[T]he [Defense] department has not paid KBR the $100 million for the trailers," Johnson told Levin. "As a matter of fact, KBR's cost is still suspended." Johnson when on to say that the DOD document from which Levin drew his information was "inaccurate." But it was Johnson who didn't have his facts straight.
More than seven months passed before the Army acknowledged Johnson's misstatement. "We sincerely regret the confusion that arose during the testimony and apologize for any impact to the Committee's deliberations," wrote Claude Bolton, assistant secretary of the Army, to Levin. In his "correction for the record," Bolton wrote that the Army had indeed paid KBR for the trailers, even though the Defense Contract Audit Agency had called the purchase "unreasonable due to KBR purchasing the [trailers] from someone other than the low bidder without...adequate justification."
The media paid little attention to the slip-up and subsequent correction, perhaps in part because, as the Army Times noted, "Bolton's letter ends the argument between the Army and Levin's committee because there is no way to recoup the money."
Nearly three months ago Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.), chair of the Democratic Policy Committee, sent a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates on the subject of Johnson's testimony, but he has yet to received a reply. "This was either an attempt by General Johnson to deliberately deceive the Congress, or a display of negligent disregard for facts," Dorgan wrote in the March 12 letter. "I hope you will review this matter and take appropriate action."
In April 2007, Johnson, then the commanding general of the US Army Sustainment Command, which is responsible for providing food, lodging, and a range of logistical support to the troops, appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee to answer questions about the Pentagon's primary logistics contract in Iraq. During the hearing, the committee's chairman, Sen. Carl Levin (D-Mich.), alleged that the Army had reimbursed KBR, then a Halliburton subsidiary, for the cost of overpriced trailers the company had purchased through a subcontractor.
"[T]he [Defense] department has not paid KBR the $100 million for the trailers," Johnson told Levin. "As a matter of fact, KBR's cost is still suspended." Johnson when on to say that the DOD document from which Levin drew his information was "inaccurate." But it was Johnson who didn't have his facts straight.
More than seven months passed before the Army acknowledged Johnson's misstatement. "We sincerely regret the confusion that arose during the testimony and apologize for any impact to the Committee's deliberations," wrote Claude Bolton, assistant secretary of the Army, to Levin. In his "correction for the record," Bolton wrote that the Army had indeed paid KBR for the trailers, even though the Defense Contract Audit Agency had called the purchase "unreasonable due to KBR purchasing the [trailers] from someone other than the low bidder without...adequate justification."
The media paid little attention to the slip-up and subsequent correction, perhaps in part because, as the Army Times noted, "Bolton's letter ends the argument between the Army and Levin's committee because there is no way to recoup the money."
posted by Kangaroo Brisbane Australia at 11:48 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home